Malwarebytes insists the law allows the company to take action against whatever it finds 'objectionable,' which in this case was Engima's software, without being sued for doing so. 'Objectionable'Ī crucial difference between the two sections is that those taking action under section A are required to act in good faith while those providing the tools to take action are not subject to that requirement. Twitter), and § 230(c)(2)(B) applies to those like Malwarebytes who provide the technical means (e.g filters) by which content restrictions are carried out. The Trump administration has it out for § 230(c)(2)(A), which applies to those who actually restrict content (e.g.
